Horse Racing Tipsters: Can You Trust Their Results?

Horse racing tipsters regularly advertise their impressive profits.

The real question is: Are they trustworthy and can you verify them? 

We reviewed 50 Australian horse racing tipping websites in March 2026 to determine whether their published results contained sufficient information for an average punter to independently verify the advertised performance.

 

The results revealed a significant transparency gap:

• Only 16% published a detailed betting history.
  
  
• Only 10% made their results easy to independently verify.
  
  
• Only 12% regularly updated their published performance.
  
  
• Just 4% met every transparency benchmark we assessed.

 

 

These findings proved that  in most cases, the publicly available evidence was not sufficient to verify the claims made by the sites and their related tipsters. .

The key take-away here is, f you are paying for racing tips, don’t ask only, “How much profit do they claim?”

Ask, “Can I verify how that result was calculated?”

 

Can You Trust Horse Racing Tipsters?

Why We Conducted This Research

Every week, punters ask us the same question.

"Who can I actually trust?"

It's becoming harder to answer.

Every tipping service seems to advertise impressive profits.

Social media is full of winning tickets.

Websites promote huge returns.

But very few explain exactly how those profits were calculated.

We wanted to know whether the average punter could actually verify the claims being made.

So we decided to investigate.

 

Our Investigation

Using publicly available information, we reviewed 50 Australian horse racing tipping services with a website presence.

Each website was assessed using the same transparency criteria.

 

We looked for whether a tipster published:

• Every historical selection made.
  
  
• Odds published and used to calculate self-reported profits.
  
  
• The source of the odds and the timing of the price taken (e.g. starting price, Top Fluc).
  
  
• The betting result.
  
  
• A running profit figure.
  
  
• The identity of the tipster.
  
  
• Regularly updated results.

 

What We Found

The same issues appeared repeatedly.

Some websites claimed years of profit without publishing every historical selection.

Others published selections but didn't include the odds used to calculate profit.

Several promoted winning bet screenshots while providing little evidence of losing bets.

While we are not suggesting these tipping services are not profitable, we are saying they make it harder for claims made by the tipping services that they are actually profitable.

Across the 50 tipping service websites we reviewed, we had the following findings:

Finding	Result
Australian horse racing tipping websites reviewed	50
Published detailed betting tip history	16%
Results easy to independently verify	10%
Results updated regularly	12%
Clearly identified the tipster	36%
Passed every transparency benchmark	4%

The key concern here for a punter looking for a genuine winning tipster online is that only 4% of tipping service met every transparency benchmark we assessed.

 

Why the Recorded Odds Matter 

One of the key challenges for punters using our transparency check-list is to identify the legitimacy of the price used to calculate profitability.

Even where tipping services meet most or all of our checklist criteria, many fall down badly on the legitimacy of the prices used to calculate their reported profits.

In many cases, the average punter following their tips would be highly unlikely to secure the odds claimed. 

In most cases where a tipster displayed a profit graph resembling the steep face of Mount Everest, we found that their results were calculated using prices at or near Top Fluctuation. 

A punter would have to be a genius to achieve this outcome even a handful of times, notwithstanding the fact that the tipping service is expecting you to get that price every time you bet on their tips. 

In many cases the fixed price used by the tipster was significantly higher than the Starting Price, which is the price available around the time most followers will be betting.

What is even more concerning for tipping services that used prices at the top of the market was the significant discrepancy in profitability between their advertised win and what the average punter would expect to receive. 

Taking Starting Price as a reasonable proxy for odds which most average punters receive, many tipping services’ advertised profit was inflated by as much as 60% profit on turnover. 

This means their use of unrealistic ‘top of the market’ odds turned their advertised 42% profit on turnover into an 18% loss on turnover.

 

 

Screenshots Aren't Proof

Winning bet slips are often used in betting promotions.

They can show a successful bet.

They don't prove long-term performance.

Screenshots rarely include:

• Every losing selection.
  
  
• Every bet placed.
  
  
• Historical staking.
  
  
• Running profit.
  
  
• A complete betting history.
  
  

They're useful marketing.

They're not independent verification.

 

Common Transparency Red Flags

If you're comparing horse racing tipsters, these are some of the biggest warning signs.

• No historical betting record.
  
  
• Missing odds.
  
  
• No bookmaker source of odds listed.
  
  
• No running profit.
  
  
• Anonymous tipsters.
  
  
• Winning screenshots instead of complete betting histories.
  
  

None of these automatically mean a service isn't profitable.

But they should encourage punters to ask more questions before relying on advertised results.

 

Frequently Asked Questions

How can I tell if a horse racing tipster is legitimate?

Look for a complete betting history that includes every selection, advised odds, bookmaker, betting result and a running profit figure. The easier the results are to verify, the easier it is to judge long-term performance.

What information should every tipster publish?

A transparent tipster should publish every selection, advised odds, bookmaker used, betting result, running profit and enough information for readers to independently verify the results.

Can horse racing tipster results be trusted?

Published results become much more credible when enough information is provided for independent verification. Without complete betting histories, advertised profits are difficult for punters to assess.

 

Key Takeaways

The biggest takeaway isn’t that these tipping services are necessarily unprofitable.

It’s that, in most cases, punters weren’t given enough information to check for themselves.

Of the 50 Australian horse racing tipping websites we reviewed, only 16% published a detailed betting history, just 10% made their results easy to independently verify, and only 4% met every transparency benchmark we assessed.

So, when comparing tipsters, don’t focus only on the profit being advertised.

Look at the evidence behind it. A transparent tipster should give you enough information to verify their performance, not simply ask you to trust it.

 

Conclusion

We didn’t conduct this research to name Australia’s best horse racing tipster or decide which services are profitable.

We wanted to answer a simpler question: Are punters being given enough information to verify the results for themselves?

Based on the publicly available information we reviewed, the answer was usually no.

That doesn’t necessarily mean the tipsters weren’t profitable. It means there often wasn’t enough evidence available for an ordinary punter to confirm the results being advertised.

So, before paying for tips, look beyond the winning screenshots and profit claims. Ask whether the tipster publishes every selection, the odds advised, the source of those odds and a complete record of results.

Ultimately, you shouldn’t have to take a tipster’s performance on trust.

When your money is on the line, the evidence should be there for you to check.

 

Want to compare tipsters using realistic, published performance data? Explore today’s horse racing tips on The Great Tip Off.